Bollywood-Cultural terrorism

The future of any nation depends on youth.

If we want to see our nation as developed nation, our youth should be strong and believe in staunch nationalism. But what our youth are doing? Spending their valuable time watching Bollywood movies(spoiling our rich culture) and treating Bollywood stars as their role models? This post is not to criticize any individual but to show some facts and make people realize that there are many real life heroes who are struggling for this country…

Lets look at the another side of Bollywood stars lives:
Salman khan case file:

please go through this link:http://ekthabandar.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/salman-khan1.jpg

Jodhpur case: In 1988 salman khan violated wild protection act of 1972 by killing tow blackbucks and endangered chinkaras.

Mumbai case: In 2002, salman khan’s drunk driving killed one and injured four others sleeping on foot path outside a bandra shop.

Mumbai case: Aishwarya’s parents had to complain to cops that slaman khan abused their daughter.

Jodhpur case: In 2007, on his way to court, at jodhpur, salman khan was caught not only speeding, but also showing red strip.

Mumbai case:In 2009, income tax department filed a case against salman khan at bombay high court due to the fact that he was caught in tax evasion.

Kanpur case: Anna’s group filed a complaint at police station, for he allowed his body guards to beat peaceful activists. one of them omendra bharat received serious injuries and thus fainted.

Salman khan is champion at abusing others.

Next role model Shah Rukh khan:-

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/shah-rukh-khan-banned-from-wankhede-stadium-for-5-years/950969/

Shah Rukh kahn abused officials in wakhande stadium, mumbai.

Next role model Saif ali khan:

Saif Ali Khan was arrested and then released on bail, after a brawl that took place outside a five-star hotel in Mumbai.
Here is what happened, according to a statement by Iqbal Sharma, who was allegedly assaulted by Saif.
Saif Ali Khan along with his girlfriend Kareena Kapoor, her sister Karishma Kapoor, Amrita Arora and her husband Shakeel Ladak, Bilal Amrohi and Malaika Arora Khan were seated adjacent to Iqbal Sharma’s table.
Says Iqbal “They were making a lot of noise and I asked the management to request them to tone it down. This happened thrice but there was no change in their behaviour. Finally at around 12:30 am we decided to leave. As we were going down the stairs, Saif was coming up, probably from the toilet. As he passed me, he called me an idiot and asked ‘do you know who I am?’”
The two later exchanged a few words, which is when Saif turned around to punch Iqbal, even as the two other men (Shakeel Ladak and Bilal Amrohi) pushed his 69 year old father-in-law.
Sharma then went to the GT Hospital, where doctors informed him that he had fractured his nasal bone. He then lodged an FIR complaint at the Colaba Police Station in Mumbai
Saif Ali Khan along with Shakeel Ladak and Bilal Amrohi were arrested at 7:30 PM and an hour later released on bail.

Saif Ali khan divorced his first wife and children and now he is in love with kareena. Why people admire such unethical people and treat them as their role models??

Please read this article:http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,361780,00.html

Bollywood’s links with mafia:

http://www.frontlineonnet.com/fl1917/19170340.htm

http://nigamrajendra.blogspot.in/2005/07/bollywood-connection-with-underworld.html

WikiLeaks says a link exists between Bollywood and gangsters.

A leaked US diplomatic cable has claimed that Bollywood films have been funded through sources of illegal finance, PTI reports.

“The industry welcomed funds from gangsters and politicians, looking for ways to launder their ill-gotten gains, known in India as ‘black money’,” said the cable issued by the US Consulate.

Bollywood used gangsters for funding as the film industry was not eligible for bank loans or other methods of commercial financing until 2000.

http://pibillwarner.wordpress.com/2009/07/10/indian-mujahideen-boss-dawood-ibrahim-runs-the-show-in-bollywood/

Next role model vidya balan:

Vidya balan who acted in adult film got national award and is appointed as brand ambassador for government’s nirmal bharat abhiyan..what a shame!!

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/the-dirty-picture-too-dirty-for-prime-time/940237/

Recently Sunny leone is doing a bollywood film in India. What a shame!

India, a country with rich culture facing cultural terrorism!!!

These are the list of evidences to realize how bollywood is dangerous to country and our culture. There are many more evidences that show bollywood is just doing cultural terrorism and today’s youth are just following them and making their lives hell!! Our cricket stars just love bollywood stars and party with them.

Know the real heroes of this country are our soldiers who are fighting at the border and giving strong security for our country. Lets salute them and remember their sacrifices.

Dear friends, lets think for our nation. Stop wasting your valuable in watching shameless bollywood movies and bollywood stars affairs.

Nobody comes form the sky to bring a change. We should change ourselves first. Please share this with all…

Jai hind!!

Bharat mata ki jai!!

Categories: Indian culture

Gau mata

gaumata-all-devi-devta

It is very sad to see Cows in Bharat wandering around dustbins and roads for food. They are innocent creatures and a cow is treated as “Mother” by followers of sanatana dharma. So friends, whenever You find any cow searching for food, offer any fruits or food to her without ignoring…
||Jai Gau mata||
Categories: Indian culture

Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple

Evidences that Prove Taj mahal(Tejo mahalaya) Was vedic Shiva temple !! (Share the truth that was hidden by our Sickular Historians)
1. The term Taj Mahal itself never occurs in any Mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb’s time. Several European visitors of Shahjahan’s time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal which is almost the correct traditional, age-old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily even Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using that Sanskrit term and call it just a holy tomb. Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term ‘Mahal’ ‘i.e. ‘mansion,’ apply to it?
2. The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the Sanskrit term ‘Tejo Mahalaya’ signifying a Shiva temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e. the Lord God of Agra was consecrated in it.

3. The tradition of removing one’s shoes before climbing the marble platform originates from pre-Shahjahan times when the Taj was a Shiva Temple. Had the Taj originated as a tomb, shoes need not have been removed because shoes are a necessity in a cemetery.

4. Visitors may notice that the base-slab of Mumtaz’s cenotaph in the basement is plain white while its superstructure and the other three cenotaphs on the two floors are covered with inlaid creeper designs. This indicates that the marble pedestal of the Shiva idol is still in place and Mumtaz’s cenotaphs are fake.

5. The pitchers carved inside the upper border of the octagonal marble lattice plus those mounted on it number 108 a figure sacred in Hindu temple – tradition.

6. In India there are 12 Jyotirlingas, i.e. outstanding Shiva temples. The Tejomahalay alias the Taj Mahal appears to be one of them known as Naganatheshwar since its parapet is girdled with Naga i.e. cobra figures. Ever since Shahjahan’s capture of it in 1631 A.D. that sacred temple has been lost to Hindudom. The famous Hindu treatise on architecture, titled Viswakarma Vastushastra mentions the ‘Tej Linga’ amongst Shiva Lingas i.e. stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Vedic deity. Such a Teja Linga was consecrated in the Taj Mahal, hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalay.

7. Agra city, in which the Taj Mahal is located, is an ancient center of Shiva worship. Its orthodox residents have through the ages continued the tradition of worshipping at five Shiva shrines before taking the last meal every night especially during the month of Shravan. During the last few centuries residents of Agra had to be content with worshipping at only four prominent Shiva temples viz. Balkeshwar, Prithvinath Manakameshwar and Rajarajeshwar. They had lost track of the fifth Shiva deity which their forefathers worshipped. Apparently the fifth was Agreshwar Mahadev Naganatheshwar i.e. the Lord Great God of Agra, and Deity of the King of cobras, consecrated in the Tejo-Mahalaya alias Taj Mahal.

The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats. Their name for Shiva is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of the Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28, 1971) mentions that the Jats have Teja Mandirs i.e. Teja Temples. This is because Teja Linga is one among several names of Shiva Lingas. From this it is apparent that the Taj Mahal is Tejo Mahalaya, the Great Abode of Tej.”

8. Shahjahan’s own court-chronicle, the Badshahnama, admits (on page 403, Vol. I) that a grand mansion of unique splendor, capped with a done (imaarat-e-alishan wa gumbaze) was taken from the Jaipur Maharaja Jaisingh for Mumtaz’s burial, and that the building was then known as Raja Mansingh’s palace.

9.Prince Aurangzeb’s letter to his father, emperor Shahjahan, belies the Archaeological Department’s reliance on Tavernier. Aurangzeb’s letter is recorded in at least three chronicles titled ‘Aadaab-e-Alamgiri’ ‘Yaadgaarnama’ and the ‘Muraqqa-I-Akbarabadi’ (edited by Said Ahmad, Agra, 1931, page 43, footnote 2) In that letter Aurangzeb records in 1652 A. D. itself that the several buildings in the fancied burial place of Mumtaz were all seven-storeyed and were so old that they were all leaking, while the dome had developed a crack on the northern side. Aurangzeb, therefore, ordered immediate repairs to the buildings at his own expense while recommending to the emperor that more elaborate repairs be carried out later. This is proof that during Shahjahan’s reign itself the Taj complex was old needed immediate repairs.

10.The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains in his secret personal Kapad Dwara collection two orders from Shahjahan dated December 18, 1633 ( bearing modern numbers R. 176 and 177 ) requisitioning the Taj building complex. That was so blatant a usurpation that the then ruler of Jaipur was ashamed to make the documents public.

11. The three firmans demanding marble were sent to Jaisingh within about two years of Mumtaz’s death. Had Shahjahan really built the Taj Mahal over a period of 22 years, the marble would have needed only after 15 or 20 years and not immediately after Mumtaz’s death.

12. Moreover, the three firmans mention neither the Taj Mahal, nor Mumtaz, nor the burial. The cost and the quantity of stone required also are not mentioned. This proves that an insignificant quantity of marble was needed just for Koranic implantation and Mumtaz’s two cenotaphs to match with the Tajmahal marble. Even otherwise Shahjahan could never hope to build a fabulous Tal Mahal by abject dependence for marble on a non-cooperative Jaisingh.

13. A Sanskrit inscription too supports the conclusion that the Taj originated as a Shiva temple. Wrongly termed as the Bateshwar inscription (currently preserved on the top floor in the Lucknow museum), it refers to the raising of a “Crystal-white Shiva temple so alluring that Lord Shiva once enshrined in it decided never to return to Mount Kailas-his usual abode.” That inscription dated 1155 A. D. was removed from the Taj Mahal garden at Shahjahan’s orders.

Far from building the Taj, Shahjahan disfigured it with black Koranic lettering displacing earlier Sanskrit inscriptions, several idols and two huge stone elephants extending their trunks in a welcome arch over the gateway where visitors these days buy entry- tickets.

An Englishman, Thomas Twining, records (page 191 of his book (TRAVELS IN INDIA – A HUNDRED VEARS AGO) that in November 1794 “I arrived at the high walls which enclose the Taj-e-Mahal and its circumjacent buildings …. I here got out of the palanquin and …. Mounted a short flight of steps leading to a beautiful portal which formed the center of this side of the Court of Elephants as the great area was called.”

14. The Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters of the Koran but nowhere is there even the slightest or remotest allusion in that Islamic overwriting to Shahjahan’s authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder he would have said so in so many words before beginning to quote the Koran.

That Shahjahan, far from building the marble Taj, only disfigured it with black lettering is mentioned by the inscriber Amanat Khan Shirazi himself in an inscription on the building.

A close scrutiny of the Koranic lettering reveals that they are grafts patched up with bits of variegated stone on an ancient Shiva temple.

Carbon – 14 Test

14. A wooden piece from the riverside eastern doorway of the Taj subjected to the carbon – 14 tests by an American laboratory, has revealed the door to be 300 years older than Shahjahan. Since the doors of the Taj, broken open by Muslim invaders repeatedly from the 11th century onwards, for plunder and ravage, had to be replaced from time to time the Taj edifice is much older than many of its doors. It belongs to 1155 A. D. i.e. almost 500 years anterior to Shahjahan.

The book has a copy of the report published by Evan Williams, Professor of Chemistry, and Brooklyn College, New York. It says that a wood piece from the door at North East end of the Taj Mahal has an age between 1448 to 1270 A.D.

Architectural Evidence

15. Well –known Western authorities on architecture like E. B. Havell, Mrs Kenoyer and Sir W. W. Hunter have gone on record to say that the Taj Mahal is built in the Hindu temple style. Havell points out that the ground plan of the ancient Hindu Chandi Seva temple in Java is identical with that of the Taj. A central dome with octagonal cupolas at its four corners is a common feature of Hindu temples.

The four marble pillars at the plinth corners are of the Hindu style. They were used as lamp–towers during the night and as watchtowers during the day. Such towers serve to demarcate the holy precincts. Hindu wedding altars and the altar set up for God Satyanarayan worship has pillars raised at their Four Corners. See our marriage mandaps.

The octagonal shape of the Taj Mahal has a special Hindu significance because: Hindus alone have special names for the eight directions, and celestial guards assigned to them. Lord Rama’s capital was octagonal as mentioned in Valmiki’s Ramayana. The pinnacle points to the heaven while the foundation signifies the nether world. Hindu forts, cities, palaces and temples generally have an octagonal layout or some octagonal features so that together with the pinnacle and the foundation they cover all ten directions in which the king or god holds sway, as per Hindu tradition.

For more evidences visit:http://www.esamskriti.com/essay-chapters/Taj-Mahal-a-Shiv-Temple-1.aspx

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/was_the_taj_mahal_a_vedic_temple.htm

Teach yourselves, teach e…

Teach yourselves, teach everyone his real nature, call uon the sleeping soul and see how it awakes. Power will come, glory will come, goodness will come, purity will come, and everything that is excellent will come when this sleeping soul is roused to self-conscious activity.

-Swami Vivekananda

Indian way of living

Significance of Namaste:-

Why do we say Namaste? The gesture (or mudra) of namaste is a simple act made by bringing together both palms of the hands before the heart.

Namaste is a composite of two Sanskrit words, Nama, and te. Te means you, and Nama means to bend, incline or bow. The meaning of these two words together is a sense of submitting oneself to another, with complete humility
The word nama is split into two, na and ma. Na signifies negation and ma represents mine. The meaning would then be ‘not mine’. The import being that the individual soul belongs entirely to the Supreme soul, which is identified as residing in the individual towards whom the namaste is directed. Indeed there is nothing that the soul can claim as its own. Namaste is thus the necessary rejection of ‘I’ and the associated phenomena of egotism. It is said that ‘ma’ in nama means death (spiritual), and when this is negated (na-ma), it signifies immortality
The whole action of namaste unfolds itself at three levels:
Mental
Physical
Verbal
The mental submission is in the spirit of total surrender of the self. This is parallel to the devotion one expresses before a chosen deity, also known as bhakti. The devotee who thus venerates with complete self-surrender is believed to partake the merits or qualities of the person or deity before whom he performs this submission. A transaction can only be between equals, between individuals who share some details in common.By performing namaste before an individual we recognise the divine spark in him.Namaste intimates the following:
The God in me greets the God in you or the Spirit in me meets the same Spirit in you.It recognizes the equality of all, and pays honor to the sacredness of all and everyone, regardless of age, status or wealth. Translated into a bodily act, namaste is deeply rich in symbolism. Firstly the proper performance of namaste requires that we blend the five fingers of the left hand exactly with the fingers of the right hand. The significance behind this simple act in fact governs the entire gamut of our active life. The five fingers of the left hand represent the five senses of karma, and those of the right hand the five organs of knowledge. Hence it signifies that our karma or action must be in harmony, and governed by rightful knowledge, prompting us to think and act correctly.

Categories: Indian culture
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.